The Lagos State Government has opposed an application seeking to
stop the prosecution of the two engineers who built the collapsed
Synagogue Church Of All Nations’ six-storey building.
The two structural engineers, Messrs Oladele Ogundeji and Akinbela
Fatiregun, had gone to court to seek an order quashing the verdict of
the coroner’s inquest which advised the state to prosecute them for
criminal negligence.
They are seeking an order of perpetual injunction restraining the Lagos State Attorney General or any officer under his authority from initiating or commencing criminal proceedings against them on the basis of the coroner’s verdict that indicted them of criminal negligence.
They are seeking an order of perpetual injunction restraining the Lagos State Attorney General or any officer under his authority from initiating or commencing criminal proceedings against them on the basis of the coroner’s verdict that indicted them of criminal negligence.
They also prayed the court to stop the police from arresting and investigating them based on the verdict of the coroner.
Contrary to the claim by SCOAN that the collapsed building was
sabotaged, the coroner had, after the inquest on July 8, 2015, found
that structural defect was responsible for the collapse of the building,
The coroner, Mr. Oyetade Komolafe, had then held the engineers liable for the death of the 116 persons who perished in the September 12, 2014, tragic incident and recommended them for prosecution.
But the engineers, who are displeased with the verdict of the coroner, had approached a Federal High Court in Lagos seeking outright dismissal of the coroner’s findings and recommendations.
The coroner, Mr. Oyetade Komolafe, had then held the engineers liable for the death of the 116 persons who perished in the September 12, 2014, tragic incident and recommended them for prosecution.
But the engineers, who are displeased with the verdict of the coroner, had approached a Federal High Court in Lagos seeking outright dismissal of the coroner’s findings and recommendations.
While seeking the protection of the court, the engineers, through
their lawyer, Mr. Olalekan Ojo, disclosed that the police had been after
them, claiming that their constitutional rights to dignity and personal
liberty, enshrined in sections 34 and 35 of the constitution, were at
stake as they could no longer move about freely.
They urged the court to make an order restraining the police from
arresting or inviting them for questioning based on the verdict of the
coroner.
The court, presided over by Justice Mohammed Idris, after listening
to Ojo on July 22, ordered the police to suspend all actions in the
matter till the suit filed by the engineers would be determined.
However, at the resumed proceedings on Monday, Lagos State,
represented by its Solicitor General,
Mr. Lawal Pedro, appeared in court
with a preliminary objection to the engineers’ prayers.
As opposed to the engineers’ claim that the suit was filed to
protect their fundamental human rights, Pedro contended that the suit
was aimed at quashing the verdict of the coroner.
While challenging the jurisdiction of the court to adjudicate over
the suit, Pedro said since the respondents were not agencies of the
Federal Government they were not subjected to the authority of the
Federal High Court where the engineers filed their suit.
He described the suit as “a gross abuse of court processes.”
He asked the court to determine whether the engineers had put
sufficient material facts before it to establish that their fundamental
human rights had been or were about to be breached as they had claimed.
Justice Idris adjourned till September 30, 2015, to hear the preliminary objection.
The September 12, 2014 tragic incident claimed the lives of 85
South Africans, 22 Nigerians, two Beninoise, one Togolese and six
unidentified persons.
Sixty of the victims were males while 56 were females.
SOURCE: PUNCH
SOURCE: PUNCH
No comments:
Post a Comment